>> Yeah, I see that message that them indeed, so I probably just
>> overlooked them on the other one, probably because the mailing list
>> filter moved the Content-Transfer-Encoding: to the end.
> And why should that matter?
Because Michael Sokolov's header parser is in wetware, which tends to
get misled by such things.
> There are no defined order for headers, just that they should be
> there.
True. This is one reason why relying on wetware parsers for such
things is..suboptimal. (And actually, what you say is not quite true;
it is verboten to reorder Received: headers, and there may be other
constraints as well, though none come to mind offhand.)
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse_at_rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Received on Sun Nov 21 2004 - 07:38:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:37:18 BST