YAAYD (Yet another "Ten (0A) year" discussion)

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: emanuel stiebler <emu_at_ecubics.com>
Date: Tue Oct 26 16:23:15 2004

Fred Cisin wrote:

> If we are going to re-adjust the number of years to include/exclude,
> then let's just scrap the entire concept of a fixed number of years,
> and declare that classic computers ran until August 10, 1981 (the
> day before the IBM PC announcement).

Jut freeze it at 1984.
Orwell, Oh well ;-)
Received on Tue Oct 26 2004 - 16:23:15 BST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jules Richardson: "YAAYD (Yet another "Ten (0A) year" discussion) (was: GOPHER"
Previous message: John Foust: "YAAYD (Yet another "Ten (0A) year" discussion) (was: GOPHER"
In reply to: Fred Cisin: "YAAYD (Yet another "Ten (0A) year" discussion) (was: GOPHER"
Next in thread: Tom Jennings: "YAAYD (Yet another "Ten (0A) year" discussion)"
Reply: Tom Jennings: "YAAYD (Yet another "Ten (0A) year" discussion)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:37:24 BST