On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Tom Jennings wrote:
> > If
> > you hold the word width constant, yes, you are right. But that is not
> > what I was talking about. In many early computers, the data buss and
> > the word width were the same.
>
> ... and many did not. The 'byte' as a convention for talking about
> memory is just that, a convention, and fails miserably on machines whose
> major casual metric is not a multiple of 8 bits. Many, many machines
> were built on a multiple of 6 bits because that's how many it took to
> define a character.
I always thought that the technical definition of a "byte" is "8-bits".
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
Received on Wed Sep 22 2004 - 14:41:18 BST