If that appears to be bad, here's a handful of the older versions.. (I
think, I've not dutifully compared them.)
http://public.planetmirror.com/pub/gcc/old-releases/libg++/
I'm surprised the old versions aren't up on ftp.gnu.org.
David
Jules Richardson wrote:
>On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 16:11 -0500, Mike Loewen wrote:
>
>
>>On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Jules Richardson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Long shot... I don't suppose anyone happens to have source for libg++
>>>v2.4.5 on an old Linux distro do they?
>>>
>>>I've got gcc 2.4.5 up and running on the Tek (I've just got xfractint
>>>built and working on it, yay!). Despite the various GNU mirrors carrying
>>>all versions of gcc though, none of them seem to carry a version of
>>>libg++ prior to 2.7 though.
>>>
>>>
>> Would libg++-2.4 work?
>>
>>http://sources-redhat.oc1.mirrors.redwire.net/gcc/old-releases/libg++/libg++-2.4.tar.bz2
>>
>>
>
>Aha, I'll give that a go - thanks!
>
>I didn't think Redhat existed when that version was current so I'm
>suprised it's lurking on a Redhat sources mirror. Hopefully it's a
>'clean' version of the source though (i.e. it wasn't modified for the
>Redhat distro that it presumably came with).
>
>Time will tell...
>
>cheers
>
>Jules
>
>
Received on Fri Feb 04 2005 - 18:36:05 GMT