eBay vrs42? (grand finale)

From: vrs <vrs_at_msn.com>
Date: Sun Feb 13 06:53:16 2005

> Or do you feel that (say) a human-rights group organizing a boycott of
> some company that uses third-world sweatshop labour, or Greenpeace
> organizing a boycott of some company they see as environmentally
> unsound, is just as wrong as the pearl-buyer collusion, or the
> ebay-buyer collusion?
> Or am I missing something else?

I thought the way that worked was that the damage inflicted on the seller
was deliberate, and an attempted punishment for damage the seller was
perceived as having perpetrated on society.

Which would be different from damaging someone for personal gain.

Received on Sun Feb 13 2005 - 06:53:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:37:37 BST