> At 02:06 PM 3/16/97 -0500, BNICALEK_at_aol.com wrote:
> I think another problem with TI 99/4A is that TI did not encourage 3rd
> party software development. TI sold the machines at a loss in order to
In fact, if I'm not mistaken, all machine language development
for the TI 99/4(a) had to be done on one of TI's big expensive
machines for the first (couple?) years. (ie, assembler was not
available on the TI 99/4A.) At one time, I found an excellent
history of TI's computer attempts on the web, but I can't seem
to find it now.
ttfn
srw
------------------------------------------------------------
Walde Techonology
http://scott.cprompt.sk.ca
Box 7284 finger: scott_at_cprompt.sk.ca
Saskatoon, SK S7K 4J2 email: scott_at_cprompt.sk.ca
CANADA email: walde_at_dlcwest.com
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS d- s:+>: a- C++++$ UL++++$ !P L++ E- W+++$ N+ o? K? w$ O- M-- V PS+
PE++ Y+ PGP->++ t+ 5 X+ !R tv- b+ DI++++ D+ G e* h r++ y-
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Received on Sun Mar 16 1997 - 20:41:39 GMT