Replies to stuff...

From: Roger Merchberger <zmerch_at_northernway.net>
Date: Wed May 7 07:22:04 1997

Due to massive amounts of caffeine & sleep deprivation, Doug Spence said:

>> > Um... hold it... how are the 4116's arranged? You probably said, but of
>> > course I can't go back into my mailbox to read that while I'm replying to
>> > this one (I knew there was a reason I should my system to do this
>> > locally!). If they're 16K by 4, then that certainly WOULD be more than
>> > 8K. :)
>>
>> I think those are only 8kx1. I did look at my expandamem board and the
>> chips with the plates on them had (c)Mostek written.
>
>Actually, I believe the quote you had in your other post said the 4116 was
>16k bits... which would make my board 64K, which is too big without some
>kind of bank switching scheme, isn't it?

Ummmm... methinks your math might be a bit off. 16Kbits would be 2K bytes,
so you'd have to have 32 chips on the board to get it to 64Kbytes... how
many chips are there on the board?

Hope this helps,
Roger "Merch" Merchberger
--
Roger Merchberger       | If at first you don't succeed,
Programmer, NorthernWay | nuclear warhead disarmament should
zmerch_at_northernway.net  | *not* be your first career choice.
Received on Wed May 07 1997 - 07:22:04 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:30:32 BST