On Thu, 6 Nov 1997, Tim Shoppa wrote:
> > Computers each and every have significance, some because of new concepts,
> > new markets or in a few cases the scams and swindles behind them! There
> > were many unremarkable computers made and many while noteable were really
> > junk!
>
> Absolutely true. I do hope that the "classiccmp" mailing list doesn't
> go in the direction that Sam suggests, i.e. limiting discussion to
> computers considered "collectible" in the popular press.
Now, when the fuck did I say that? Is there any one single place in my
previous message where I either explicitly or even implicitly suggested
what you are stating? If so, please do point it out. Otherwise, pull
your head from out of your ass, Tim.
Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar_at_siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer Historian, Programmer, Musician, Philosopher, Athlete, Writer, Jackass
Coming Soon...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
See
http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
Received on Fri Nov 07 1997 - 10:36:42 GMT