On 7 Nov 97 at 8:36, Sam Ismail wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Nov 1997, Tim Shoppa wrote:
>
> > > Computers each and every have significance, some because of new concepts,
> > > new markets or in a few cases the scams and swindles behind them! There
> > > were many unremarkable computers made and many while noteable were really
> > > junk!
> >
> > Absolutely true. I do hope that the "classiccmp" mailing list doesn't
> > go in the direction that Sam suggests, i.e. limiting discussion to
> > computers considered "collectible" in the popular press.
>
> Now, when the fuck did I say that? Is there any one single place in my
> previous message where I either explicitly or even implicitly suggested
> what you are stating? If so, please do point it out. Otherwise, pull
> your head from out of your ass, Tim.
>
>
> Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar_at_siconic.com
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Computer Historian, Programmer, Musician, Philosopher, Athlete, Writer, Jackass
>
> Coming Soon...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
> See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
>
Back off Sam It's not important and this isn't comp.sys. apple2
Control freaks .....Sheeeesh
lwalkerN0spaM_at_interlog.com
Received on Sun Nov 09 1997 - 04:26:07 GMT