24x80 Standard? (was: Re: HX20)
 
I wrote:
> No.  I've seen 64-column text on typical mid-70s NTSC televisions, and it was
> abysmal.  The televisions had to be modified to remove their color trap
> in order to get reasonably sharp characters.
Hans replied:
> (Please, notice, I havn't talked about Colour TV)
> 
> First, basicly 70's tv had the same specs than todays.
No.  Modern TVs have *much* better Y/C separation.  Even the sets without comb
filters still are better than the mid-70s sets.  And the luminance bandwidth
of modern TVs is much improved.  We're comparing average televisions from the
mid 70s and present, not top-of-the-line models.
Even monochrome monitors had the color trap, which is what prevented
legible text display of much more than 64 columns.  And usually it was a
low-pass filter, rather than a notch filter.  It never was a comb filter.
Besides which, mid-70s TVs, monochrome or not, simply were not designed for
the horizontal bandwidth needed for good text display.
Apple's choice of a 40-column display was entirely correct given that they
were originally marketing it to people who would use it with a television.
Inexpensive video monitors weren't yet available.  Of my friends who bought
Apple ][ computers in the 1977 time frame, over half used the computer with
a television.  Most of the rest used Sanyo 9-inch or 12-inch monochrome
monitors, and only a few used color monitors.
IIRC, the Sanyo 9-inch monochrome monitor cost over $300 in 1977.
Eric
Received on Mon Dec 14 1998 - 18:19:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:30:49 BST