>Dave wrote:
>>Max Eskin wrote:
>>
>> It is my understanding that there was once a (Microsoft?) Visual Basic
>> for DOS. Was it like VB for Windows, and was it any better than QBasic?
>
>There was a Microsoft QuickBasic for DOS. I believe it got up to at
>least version 4.0. I used it long ago on a project or two.
>
>You probably can find a cheap (~$20?) copy of this at some used software
>store, like Half Price Software.
The commercially available version of QuickBasic differs from the one that
comes with DOS in part by being compiliable. Some versions support 16-bit
OS/2.
There was a version of Visual Basic for DOS, I think it was around the
version 2 timeframe, or it might have been between 1 & 2. In any case your
best bet of finding it would be the used software places. I think it was
pretty short lived, as it came out at about the time MS quit doing DOS
stuff. I can't remember if it let you share your code with the standard
VB, but I think it did. In any case it would be better than the commercial
QuickBasic, and either is better than what comes with DOS.
Zane
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh_at_ix.netcom.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh_at_holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| For Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| see
http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/ |
| For the collecting of Classic Computers with info on them. |
| see
http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/museum.html |
Received on Sun Feb 01 1998 - 19:37:45 GMT