At 13:01 2/4/98 PST, you wrote:
>First of all, did MS Xenix run on PC hardware?
Sure. XENIX was intended as a UN*X-style NOS that would allow a 286 AT to
serve a flock of XT clients. It could use protected mode, IIRC.
>Secondly, was there ever a Windows NT 1.0 and 2.0? How did they compare
>to a cheap version of UNIX?
NT prior to 3.x was called MS LAN Manager, and didn't compare particularly
well to anything.
__________________________________________
Kip Crosby engine_at_chac.org
http://www.chac.org/index.html
Computer History Association of California
Received on Wed Feb 04 1998 - 16:15:50 GMT