> Sure. XENIX was intended as a UN*X-style NOS that would allow a 286 AT to
> serve a flock of XT clients. It could use protected mode, IIRC.
>
> >Secondly, was there ever a Windows NT 1.0 and 2.0? How did they compare
> >to a cheap version of UNIX?
>
> NT prior to 3.x was called MS LAN Manager, and didn't compare particularly
> well to anything. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Boy, you got that right! It wasn't even better than 3Com 3+Share
(and that was MS-DOs based)! I lost alot of nights sleep (and almost
my shirt!) trying to keep a Lan Mangler 1.1 system up and running.
It was truly suckful at best . . .
Jeff
> __________________________________________
> Kip Crosby engine_at_chac.org
> http://www.chac.org/index.html
> Computer History Association of California
>
>
>
Received on Wed Feb 04 1998 - 17:09:53 GMT