Provenance and lineage

From: John Higginbotham <higginbo_at_netpath.net>
Date: Wed Feb 25 12:17:30 1998

At 09:27 AM 2/25/98 -0800, you wrote:

>Absent that, though, I think that any Apple One "replica" would currently
>be considered a forgery.

It wouldn't be a forgery, because we wouldn't be trying to sell the replica
Apple I as an original Apple I. I'm thinking nostalgia value here guys, not
trying to make money on forgeries.


- John Higginbotham
- limbo.netpath.net
Received on Wed Feb 25 1998 - 12:17:30 GMT