What's with the raw HTML?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Dan Stephans II <adept_at_mcs.com>
Date: Sun Mar 15 15:41:22 1998

That is much better. :)

Dan

Greg Troutman wrote:

> Dan Stephans II wrote:
> > I don't argue that HTML rich text is fine for mailing lists,
> > however if you are going to argue that it is not you should formulate a
> > proper argument.
> >
>
> Try starting with the opposite premise - it has always been considered
> to be
> inconsiderate to post anything other than plain ASCII text by mail
> unless
> _explicitly_ requested otherwise by the recipient.
>
> Now formulate a good arguement for posting HTML _especially_ to a
> classic
> list.
>
> (Dons asbestos suit and runs for cover ;-)
>
> Regards
> Pete
Received on Sun Mar 15 1998 - 15:41:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:31:08 BST