On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, D. Peschel wrote:
> > I bet it would work, or at least do something of interest. The "illegal
> > opcodes" of the NMOS and HMOS 6502s are quite functional -- Commodore programs
> > are littered with suspicious opcodes like LAX (load .AR and .X simultaneously).
> > With all that hidden functionality, why bother with the CMOS versions? ;-)
>
> I've always wondered about the internal construction of the 6502. Sure, you
> can look at a list of illegal instructions but the list doesn't tell you why
> the instructions do what they do, only what they do.
If you look at what bits are on in the opcode you can see how certain
"illegal" instructions that perform, say accumulator operations and X
register operations fit into both respective instruction families.
> And did Chuck Peddle ever show up at the VCF? He would be THE person to ask
> (OK, maybe Steve Wozniak would know too).
Nope. Didn't see him. But he'll most likely be a speaker at VCF 3.0.
Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar_at_siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever onward.
Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
See
http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 09/21/98]
Received on Thu Oct 08 1998 - 00:01:51 BST