Another important factor is newer software that uses code from ancient
programs. Examples of this are various algorithms (that could be
y2K sensitive). Also, I'm pretty sure that there are at least a
couple of dozen lines that are exactly the same in MS-DOS 7 and in
Q-DOS. Same goes for other operating systems and software.
>> that haven't had to change, or that can't be changed. How many
>> serious businesses are still running the same unchanged sourceless
>> app since 1978, much less 1968 or 1958?
>
>Amazing, isn't it? I'm sure those same sentiments were expressed back
in
>1978, 1968 and 1958 by the same incredulous programmers who supposed
that
>perhaps their programs would still be crunching away in 1998.
>
>I don't think the software I've written thats been in the field since
1993
>will still be there in 2003, but there's no reason it can't be, and I
>would be thrilled (and amazed) to find out that it was.
>
>I'm sure the guys who wrote Sage Professional Editor back in the late
80s
>would be amazed that I still use it for all my code writing (in DOS
>windows under Win95) and swear by it (best damn text editor ever
>developed...yeah, you heard me!)
>
>SO anyway, believe it. Code from the 50s and 60s still churns away,
>calculating the taxes you owe, the fines you are assessed and the bank
>statements you received.
>
>Sellam Alternate e-mail:
dastar_at_siconic.com
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Ever onward.
>
> Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
> See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
> [Last web site update: 09/21/98]
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at
http://www.hotmail.com
Received on Wed Oct 21 1998 - 16:43:22 BST