Dumpster Diving was Re: Washington DC area vintage sour

From: Max Eskin <maxeskin_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Wed Oct 28 20:01:23 1998

>
>On Wed, 28 Oct 1998, Pete Joules wrote:
>
>> > Seams to be an attitude of all management - bann whatever
>> > you don't undestand
>>
>> I think the attitude of many companies in the UK is "if we wanted to
give
Indeed. Too bad people must always abuse a privelege

>
>Let me add a little perspective to this.
>
>Say you ran a company, and being a good collector and occasional
dumpster
>diver, you had a policy that anything broken could be taken home by
>employees if the company decided they didn't want to fix it. So the
>hacker employees are happy because they get some nice stuff they can
fix
>and use in their spare time. But what happens when employees start
>intentionally breaking things, or worse, pulling small parts out of
>equipment to make it look broke, so they can then take it home and
replace
>the missing fuse or chip? I think that is why you have the rather
>seemingly unreasonable policies about discard equipment.
>
>> I think with the modern ideas about environmentally friendly disposal
of

Judging from the labels on dumpsters, this has already happened.
"Do not play in or around dumpster"
>
>Until one loathesome scavenger cuts a finger off on some particularly
>sharp piece of metal and sues the owner, the trash company, the maker
of
>the trash container for not making it so they could get inside in the
>first place, etc. (at least in the U.S.)
>
>Sellam Alternate e-mail:
dastar_at_siconic.com
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Ever onward.
>
> Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
> See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
> [Last web site update: 09/21/98]
>
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Received on Wed Oct 28 1998 - 20:01:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:31:30 BST