z80 timing... 6502 timing

From: Allison J Parent <allisonp_at_world.std.com>
Date: Sat Apr 17 09:44:12 1999

<> And then you woke up. First what are the rules, 6502 or 65C02, code in Ro
<> or Ram, what is the code supposed to do?
<>
<> My vote goes for something with some graphical element so we can "see" wh
<> is happening. (spinning ball, etc.)

Grpahincs favor certain cpus but then we also ahve to specify the graphic
interface as it may penelize some due to interface. Personally graphics
are an issue unto themselves and seperate

A possible list of micros for that era, I used 1982 as a cutoff date:

8bitters:
        6502
        z80
        8080
        8085
        2650
        1802
        SC/MP
        6800 (01/02/03, 6803)
        6809
        8048
        8049
        8051
        z8
        uPD 7800 (7800, 7811)
                        
16bit or larger:

        TI9900
        808x
        6800x
        16032
        z8000
        T-11 (PDP-11 in a 40 pin dip and not the F11.)
        1600
        9440 uFlame
        Pace/8900

No doubt I've missed a few.

Let the war begin.

Allison
Received on Sat Apr 17 1999 - 09:44:12 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:31:43 BST