z80 timing... 6502 timing

From: Sellam Ismail <dastar_at_ncal.verio.com>
Date: Sat Apr 17 17:32:52 1999

On Sat, 17 Apr 1999, Richard Erlacher wrote:

> You were the one who mentioned the graphics so one could see what was going

Well, there you go again, misattributing quotes. I never said such.

> on. What I had in mind was a computation, e.g "compute the product of three
> M x N x L matrices, where M, N, and L are <127, containing prime decimal
> numbers of not more than 511 and not fewer than 256 digits each".

Ok, so is the exercise to write such an algorithm, or to write a simulator
that will then run the code for this algorithm? Or do you want to create
a board that runs the simulator to run the code for the algorithm? I
think to make this worthwhile, we should write a simulator that simulates
the board that runs the simulator that the code will run on.

> An environment has to be selected for a task like this. You know what I
> mean. There has got to be some limit on how much a process is helped or
> hindered by the environment.

Ok, the environment is any home micro from the 70s or 80s that ran on any
processor. The more rudimentary the processor, the more points you get.
I choose the 4004.

Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar_at_siconic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't rub the lamp if you don't want the genie to come out.

             Coming this October 2-3: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0!
                   See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
                        [Last web site update: 04/03/99]
Received on Sat Apr 17 1999 - 17:32:52 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:31:43 BST