On Sun, 18 Apr 1999, Sellam Ismail wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Apr 1999, Bruce Lane wrote:
>
> > >20 points extra if you can tell us why the unit in this picture:
> > >
> > >http://www.computergarage.org/Garage/Paxton/P049.JPG
> > >
> > >had enough significance to rank fairly high on my 'nab' list...
> >
> > I can't be 100% certain, but is not that an early digitizer, useful with
> > vintage Tek O-scopes?
>
> Damn, now how come I seem to be the only one that can't seem to access
> Jim's site?
I found the culprit:
Tracing route to mail.computergarage.org [209.162.216.121]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
8 45 ms 29 ms 36 ms core1.Seattle.cw.net [204.70.4.165]
9 40 ms 41 ms 30 ms border4-fddi-0.Seattle.cw.net [204.70.3.147]
10 * easy-street-online.Seattle.cw.net [204.70.55.18] reports:
Destination net unreachable.
Wacky.
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar_at_siconic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't rub the lamp if you don't want the genie to come out.
Coming this October 2-3: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0!
See
http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 04/03/99]
Received on Sun Apr 18 1999 - 02:07:05 BST
