>
>> One other thing I'd say, though, is that it's perhaps a bit questionable
>> publishing code as yet because it will pollute the idea pool (no
reflection
>> on the quality of the submitted code) in that those who read it over
(which
>> I haven't for that reason) will potentially have their own approach
>> influenced by seeing someone else's.
>
>Or they'll find ways to improve on it, which is what gives this whole
>seemingly pointless exercise actual meaning and purpose.
>
>Sellam Alternate e-mail:
dastar_at_siconic.com
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Careful now! What I find better may not be better to you. It depends on
your goals and outlook. I'd have liked it better if the initial phase had
been without code listings and description of the approach chosen.
Nevertheless, there's not much harm done. One who wishes to be entirely
original doesn't have to peek.
Dick
Received on Mon Apr 19 1999 - 23:37:02 BST