Now OT: Re: Roman numerals

From: Hans Franke <Hans.Franke_at_mch20.sbs.de>
Date: Wed Apr 21 18:16:58 1999

> >> > And no doubt some poor slave just finished chisling in all the closing
> >> > stock prices for the Roman Stock Exchange and some spelling weenie piped up
> >> > and said only, "You misspelled 18 on line 30 there."
> >> and said only, "You misspelled XVIII on line XXX there."
> >Now we know where his family went after there was no longer
> >a roman stock exchange :)

> OTOH, if we all used Roman Numerals for data storage still, there would
> be no Y2K problem due to "extra" digits!

In fact, even when using the indic-arabic system, if rome would
still rule (name the legal follower :) the date would be way more
aprobiate, since it would be the year 2751 - so we still would
have 49 more years ... the unix problem will hit earlier.

Gruss
H.

--
Stimm gegen SPAM:     http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/de/
Vote against SPAM:    http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/en/
Votez contre le SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/fr/
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
Received on Wed Apr 21 1999 - 18:16:58 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:31:45 BST