History ran a different course from where I sit. In 1985, the R65C02 was in
almost every new communications product I saw, e.g. FAX machines, though
many had a custom device. Those custom devices in many cases had a 65C02
core. Rockwell pushed it into those applications by making many of their
other parts "friendly" to the 650x core. The 805x was a mite slow out of
the blocks, and in '85, it was real but not appealing and certainly not
taking much business from the Z-80 or 650x because its price was still WAY
too high. It was, however, a single-chip device . . .
There's this old military saying, that "where you sit determines what you
see."
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Allison J Parent <allisonp_at_world.std.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp_at_u.washington.edu>
Date: Wednesday, April 21, 1999 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: z80 timing... 6502 timing
><For the longest time, the TMS 9900 didn't appear in anything one could
><consider a reasonable computer. There was one model I saw at a colleagues
>
>One of the first commercial lorans had it! it was big in embedded circles
>that needed some oomph or were replacing ti990 minis.
>
><didn't pursue it and so I believe(d) it to be true. I saw one ad for an
><SC/MP, in '77, but that one was a homebrewed model. Other than that, it
wa
>
>You didn't look hard. It was popular in embedded apps at the low end as it
>was cheap and easy to code for.
>
><of any operating system or application software for it. I don't believe
><ever saw a real SC/MP based computer.
>
>For the consumer market?
Well, that's what we're discussing, isn't it?
>In the 1981 to 1982 timeframe:
>
> 808x was getting into embeeded apps and there were few general computer
apps for it.
>
> Z8000 series were getting in to military boxes.
>
Received on Wed Apr 21 1999 - 18:34:14 BST