That does not compute

From: Pete Turnbull <pete_at_dunnington.u-net.com>
Date: Fri Jan 1 08:10:39 1999

On Dec 31, 20:01, Sam Ismail wrote:
> AppleSoft didn't have a PRINT _at_ statement so chalk that one up to my
> arrogant ignorance. Interestingly though, Woz squeezed the '_at_' symbol
> on to the original Apple ][ keyboard above the P key (shift-P = _at_). Who
> knows why. The _at_ wasn't used for anything inherent in the Apple.

It follows teletype usage, I think; CTRL-SHIFT-_at_ = CTRL-@ = NUL Probably
Woz had a use for 'NUL' rather than '_at_'.

w.r.t. "PRINT _at_", several BASICs (but not Applesoft) had "PRINT AT"
instead.

-- 
Pete						Peter Turnbull
						Dept. of Computer Science
						University of York
Received on Fri Jan 01 1999 - 08:10:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:32:03 BST