Hi Glen, I'll keep this short as we're heading MAJORLY off topic here....
>Sorry to hear it. 95 OSR2.x is actually a bit more stable than the
>earlier versions, so if you're running something prior to 2.0 you
>may want to upgrade again (can't believe I'm saying this . . .)
On my home system I've found little difference in terms of stability between
OSR1 and 2 (I mainly run Office, IE4 and Frontpage, as well as some emulators),
but having supported WIn95 systems in two different jobs I'd not disagree with
that statement....
>> I'd be using Linux right now if I could get versions of the software
>>I need to use for it.
>
>They'll be here soon, we hope . . .
Quite, I've got some (little) experience with various flavours of Unix and it
would definitely be my OS of choice if I could get the software I need for
it....it's very frustrating.
TTFN - Pete.
--
Hardware & Software Engineer. Sound Engineer.
Collector of Arcade Machines, Games Consoles & Obsolete Computers (esp DEC)
peter.pachla_at_virgin.net |
peter.pachla_at_vectrex.freeserve.co.uk |
peter.pachla_at_wintermute.free-online.co.uk | www.wintermute.free-online.co.uk
--
Received on Wed Jul 07 1999 - 07:51:56 BST