On 23 Jun 99 at 20:02, blstuart_at_bellsouth.net wrote:
> In message <000901bebda6$98d3c9f0$bb88e9cf_at_yamato.chipware.com>, "Bill Sudbrink
> " writes:
> >> Ah yes. Active use of Rax's theory in computing collecting. I
> >> have multiple instances of empirical proof of it's validity.
> >> Wonder what I would need to draw an Apple 1 to me.
> >
> >WARNING! I have amassed a large body of data that shows
> >that this theory DOES NOT APPLY to Ohio Scientific products.
>
> It also doesn't seem to apply to straight 8s. I've had a users
> manual for one for years. (Snitched it from my parents attic
> when I got into computers along with a price list dated a few
> months before the machine was actually introduced.) The only
> one I've even seen though belonged to DEC and was on display
> at NCC'81. My new boss, though, did claim to know where a
> couple of 8s might be, so hope springs eternal.
>
> Brian L. Stuart
>
Time does not necessarily figure in to the theory, besides which manuals
are not hardware and have little attractive power. :^)
ciao larry
lwalker_at_interlog.com
Let us know of your upcoming computer events for our Events Page.
t3c_at_xoommail.com
Collectors List and info
http://members.xoom.com/T3C
Received on Thu Jun 24 1999 - 12:35:48 BST