> > Or another thing: maybe just copy only the real name part
> > into the archives and skip the address at all (remember
> > it's ["]name["] <address>) ? So you only need to come
> > up with generated names for users who don't use a name
> > part in the from header. Couldn't this be a solution ?
> > Address harvesters can't find usefull addresses, while,
> > as usual, the people show their face (name). Or is there
> > any reason to put up a mask ?
> The default spammode would list a header as such:
> To: classiccmp_at_xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Mailing list archives? Questions...
> From: "Hans Franke" <Hans.Franke_at_xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 15:39:09 +1
> In-reply-to:
> <Pine.LNX.4.04.10004021322380.21968-100000_at_is1.wfi-inc.com>
> Organization: SIEMENS AG
> Reply-To: classiccmp_at_xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sender: owner-classiccmp_at_xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> The individual still has his/her name attached, just no email address...
Well, I'm still not a fan of it, but the solution is acceptable.
Thank you
Servus
Hans
--
VCF Europa am 29./30. April 2000 in Muenchen
http://www.vintage.org/vcfe
http://www.homecomputer.de/vcfe
Received on Mon Apr 03 2000 - 13:00:03 BST