At 10:34 24-12-2000 -0500, Neil Cherry wrote:
>Let me repeat what 'You' wrote: Um, isn't the gateway the same as the
>router interface?
Not to my mind. My router, having two Ethernet ports, must have an IP
address for each of those ports. In order to be a part of the subnet on the
Cisco side, the port attached to it must have an IP address out of the
63.226 block I've been assigned. Ergo, that address is not available for a
machine.
Yes, my router does full 1:1 NAT mapping and firewalling. The Cisco is not
capable of anything near as sophisticated, so I'm simply using it for its
DSU features.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin_at_bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77 (Extra class as of June-2K)
"I'll get a life when someone demonstrates to me that it would be
superior to what I have now..." (Gym Z. Quirk, aka Taki Kogoma).
Received on Sun Dec 24 2000 - 11:01:36 GMT