Bruce Lane wrote:
> I would also add that I was almost hopelessly lost with Sendmail, even
> after reading parts of the O'Reilly book on it. qmail was much easier to
> deal with, and I would not hesitate to suggest it to anyone putting up a
> Unix mailserver.
I run Postfix on any machine it will compile on (I was thinking of
trying it on the Data General, just for kicks). It's far less resource
intensive than anything I've used so far, and it's configuration is
blindingly simple. And it's damned secure.
I've had some bad experiences with qmail, and Postfix has been
flawless. Now to get it running on my NeXT. :)
--
Tim Harrison
Network Engineer
harrison_at_timharrison.com
http://www.networklevel.com/
Received on Wed Dec 27 2000 - 08:43:08 GMT