regarding the reply address on the list.... (fwd)

From: David C. Jenner <djenner_at_halcyon.com>
Date: Wed Feb 2 21:54:46 2000

I vote for the new way. It's now trivial to
reply either to the sender alone, the sender
and the list, or the list alone.

With a decent mailer each of these options is
now one click.

Vastly superior.

Dave

healyzh_at_aracnet.com wrote:
>
> > I'm not saying any of this to say how it should be set up. That's not my
> > call. I'm just saying what I've typically seen on other lists. If Derek
> > wants it changed to the old method, he can do it or he can call me to do it.
> >
> > I personally prefer the new way, but my vote doesn't count! :)
> >
> > Jay West
>
> I personally vote for the old way! I'm on quite a few different ML's and
> only the DECnet/Linux one does it this way. It's more of a pain to have to
> get the correct TO: with it set this way that the old way! Especially if
> I'm using 'elm', like right now, since I either have to forward it to the
> ML, or remember to chage the TO: after I'm done typing the message.
>
> Zane
Received on Wed Feb 02 2000 - 21:54:46 GMT