regarding the reply address on the list....

From: allisonp_at_world.std.com <(allisonp_at_world.std.com)>
Date: Thu Feb 3 07:32:17 2000

Well from pine via telnet the current way means marvin just got two copies
and I don't plan to edit the message as it too damm slow.

The mailer at home seems to be an oddbal and has no reply to all and the
from: address it will use is the first or last(have to look) in the
header. In the end the most visible address is the one I'm likely to
reply to by error.

Oh, and I really hate getting things twice, NetBSD-Port-VAX is dont this
way and I get anything I reply to and their replys at least twice.

Another pet peeve, posts/replies in html, I don't read them and dump them
sumarily as A) they are often spam, B)the are a pain to handle via said
slow telnet and pine.

Oh, I have no plans for IE or any other browser based mail and really
don't want to use MS OS if I can avoid it. So that rather limits what
some consider a decent mailer.

Allison
Received on Thu Feb 03 2000 - 07:32:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:32:52 BST