languages

From: Richard Erlacher <edick_at_idcomm.com>
Date: Thu Mar 9 20:03:37 2000

That's not what is going on here!

Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Strickland <jim_at_calico.litterbox.com>
To: classiccmp_at_classiccmp.org <classiccmp_at_classiccmp.org>
Date: Thursday, March 09, 2000 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: languages


>>
>> allisonp_at_world.std.com wrote:
>> > Up to that point verbs and nouns were
>> > more of an abstraction needed to pass tests than working tools.
>>
>> This sentence no verb! :-)
>
>Erm. Hmm. You can construe that sentance to have a verb, but it doesn't
>make any sense if you do. :) Verb, the word, has become a verb of late.
>To verb another word, you make it into a verb. So if you verb verb (ugh)
>you're saying your sentance doesn't verb. (double ugh). :)
>
>Now you've done it. You've got me playing word games. :)
>
>--
>Jim Strickland
>jim_at_DIESPAMMERSCUMcalico.litterbox.com
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> BeOS Powered!
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thu Mar 09 2000 - 20:03:37 GMT