On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Bruce Lane wrote:
> I will agree with your first statement (that many of us have
> been 'flayed' as it were). What I cannot understand is why Sellam
> feels such a need to enroll the entire list in his (often violent)
> disagreements with others.
It's really bizarre that you would make this complaint, since in all the
times I've sent you off-list replies to prevent turning the list into a
war zone, you've gone ahead and posted my private messages back to the
list--breaking all sorts of rules on netiquette, which you claim to hold
so highly. How do you explain this?
I think a big part of the problem is that when I point out how some person
has their head up their ass, other people take it upon themselves to get
upset. Bruce, you have your head up your ass. Who's turn is it now to be
upset?
> Is there anyone on the list who DOESN'T think that such
> arguments are best settled via private E-mail? Even if the eventual
Apparently you, as I've explained above.
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger
http://www.vintage.org
Received on Sat Oct 14 2000 - 03:52:40 BST