OT: reply-to essay
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Sean 'Captain Napalm' Conner <
spc_at_armigeron.com
>
Date
: Tue Sep 12 17:57:39 2000
It was thus said that the Great Chuck McManis once stated:
>
> A good read:
>
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> Makes a lot of points that I agree with :-)
> --Chuck
Wheren't you here this past February when we hashed all this out? Simon
Hill has another point of view:
http://www.metasystema.org/reply-to-useful.mhtml
and even I make comment on
this at
http://linus.slab.conman.org/~spc/replyto.html
I disagree with Chip and agree with Simon. But in any case, read
RFC-822---it actually allows Reply-To: munging.
-spc (And on my page, the list in question is this very list 8-P
Received on
Tue Sep 12 2000 - 17:57:39 BST
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Sellam Ismail: "OT: reply-to essay"
Previous message
:
Chuck McManis: "OT: reply-to essay"
In reply to
:
Chuck McManis: "OT: reply-to essay"
Next in thread
:
Sellam Ismail: "OT: reply-to essay"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:33:19 BST