OT: reply-to essay

From: Sellam Ismail <foo_at_siconic.com>
Date: Tue Sep 12 16:59:39 2000

On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Chuck McManis wrote:

> A good read:
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> Makes a lot of points that I agree with :-)
> --Chuck
> [I apologize in advance for the thirty-eleven messages this may or may not
> spawn.]

And I'll be the first.

I think a link to this essay was posted before, and my comments then are
the same as now.

This essay looks at this issue from the author's own self-serving and
narrow-minded concerns. He bases his argument on nothing more than his
own (unsubstantiated) opinions and preferences.

You can take the same essay, change a few prepositions around, and come up
with the exact opposite argument quite easily.

Fooey. The author should be beat with a LART, and Chuck, you should be
smacked for bringing this up again :)

Sellam International Man of Intrigue and Danger
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking for a six in a pile of nines...

                       VCF 4.0 is September 30-October 1
               San Jose Convention Center, San Jose, California
                    See http://www.vintage.org for details!
Received on Tue Sep 12 2000 - 16:59:39 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:33:19 BST