SemiOT: Mourning for Classic Computing
> Douglas Quebbeman skrev:
>
> >> But then is Pascal that bad?
>
> >Bad? Bad at what? bad *for* what?
>
> We were discussing beginner's languages and alternative to BASIC.
I do think it's less likely for someone to pick up bad
programming habits if they start with Pascal, but that's
not an absolute, just a probability thing.
> I think the interpreter makes BASIC unequalled pedagogically.
If you like the immediacy of the interpreter environment,
you should try programming in Smalltalk-80. Typing an
expression, selecting it, and choosing DO IT (or PRINT IT)
from the context menu is almost as fast as
?"This is a test"
-dq
Received on Fri Aug 17 2001 - 11:46:56 BST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:33:33 BST