NOTICE FROM THE LIST HOST -- a vote in favor of limited moderation

From: mjsnodgr_at_rockwellcollins.com <(mjsnodgr_at_rockwellcollins.com)>
Date: Thu Aug 23 10:22:04 2001

I'd have to agree wholeheartedly. After being gone for a couple days,
I've read 5 of the several hundred (mostly OT) classiccmp e-mails, the rest
are immediately deleted. I like the list, but due to the sheer volume of OT
riff-raff, I"ve been trying to switch to digest mode so I can get a little
more work done. Hmmm... So if we became a 95% on topic list... I could
still recieve all the wonderfully classic (legitimate) mail throughout the
day, and not have to weed through religion (cars) and politics. I like it
Mr. Mayor, I like it.

     - M.S.





Marvin <marvin_at_rain.org>@classiccmp.org on 08/22/2001 11:51:07 AM

Please respond to classiccmp_at_classiccmp.org

Sent by: owner-classiccmp_at_classiccmp.org


To: classiccmp_at_classiccmp.org
cc:

Subject: Re: NOTICE FROM THE LIST HOST -- a vote in favor of limited
      moderation



Hear, hear!!!! I too have taken to scanning the top line of each message
and end up basically deleting them with the decision made in about .2
seconds. I used to read everything but there is just too much garbage to do
that anymore with my limited time. I do not favor moderation, but I do
favor
responsible posting.

Jonathan Engdahl wrote:
>
> Jay:
>
> I vote for the selective moderation idea. A monthly FAQ is also a good
idea.
> There are three things that need to be corrected on this list:
>
> - off topic volume is way too high
> - we need to eliminate insults, personal attacks, and language that is
> obviously intended to offend
> - subject lines need to correctly identify the content of the message
when
> the topic has drifted
>
> Perhaps a warning to offenders, and the knowledge that you *could* put
them
> on the moderated senders list, might be enough to correct the majority of
> the problem posts.
>
> I don't know why, but the other classic computer related lists I am
> subscribed to have almost none of these problems. On the others, I at
least
> glance at each message. On this list, I have been forced to scan for
> messages that seem to have relevant subject lines, and delete 97% of the
> rest without even looking at them. Effectively, the garbage-senders have
> crowded me out of full participation in the list.
>
> On the other hand, I remain subscribed because it is the most active, and
> has the highest likelihood of being helpful in a short time when someone
> comes up with a question.
>
> --
> Jonathan Engdahl???????????????? Rockwell Automation
> Principal Research Engineer????? 24800 Tungsten Road
> Advanced Technology????????????? Euclid, OH 44117, USA
> Euclid Labs????????????????????? engdahl_at_cle.ab.com 216-266-6409
Received on Thu Aug 23 2001 - 10:22:04 BST