Plastic or Ceramic?

From: Iggy Drougge <optimus_at_canit.se>
Date: Sat Aug 25 00:56:38 2001

Adrian Vickers skrev:

>At 11:37 pm 22/08/2001 +0100, you wrote:
>>> However, both DIL variants are available in in plastic or ceramic carriers
>>> - what is the advantage/disadvantage of either of those?
>>
>>Ceramic packages generally work over a larger temperature range, and may
>>be more reliable under harsh conditions. Plastic pacakges are cheaper.

>I thought it *may* be something like that. I notice the QL uses a ceramic
>MC68008, perhaps this meant they didn't need a heatsink on it.

I must say that I've never seen a 68000 (or 68008 for that matter) with a
heatsink, be it in Amigas, HPs, Ataris or industrial systems. The 68000
doesn't heat up like a Pentium or a 68040.
OTOH, could any one confirm whether the 68000 was only available in ceramics
at first? The only non-plastic one I've seen was in a very old system.

--
En ligne avec Thor 2.6a.
"Wer nichts zu sagen hat, sagt es auf Englisch."
(-Walter Kr?mer, bez?gl. Anglizismen.)
Received on Sat Aug 25 2001 - 00:56:38 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:33:34 BST