Geoff, if you go to
http://www.memoryx.com you can get a replacement chip
for $19. That's where I got mine and it works great.
g.
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Geoff Reed wrote:
> At 10:39 AM 8/29/01 -0400, you wrote:
> >Of course you'd have to pay them: they have to take a # from
> >from their database, update their mfg systems, mail you a
> >MAC address label...it's a service ans you should expect to pay!
> >IEEE charges about 3KU$ for a range of MAC addresses and entry.
>
> Hmmm, could it be because they should have coded the HostID into something
> OTHER than a NVRAM that they knew would lose it's battery
> eventually??? it's just a method to make a few extra bucks to them.
>
> Of course there's also the fact that Sun is using a location in the NVRAM
> that is not in the manufacturers spec so if you get a current rev 48tXX
> chip to use in your sun, the OBP(bios) complains about a bad NVRAM chip
> :(:(:( ST Microelectronics recently redid the timekeeper chips using a
> smaller die, and in doing so, recoded them to operate exactly to what the
> published spec has always said.. Sun uses a non-documented location in the
> nvram for some of it's power-on tests so that now fails with the
> timekeepers that are 100% specification compliant.
>
>
Received on Wed Aug 29 2001 - 17:02:40 BST