Lack of robustness with 1K and 4K RAM chips (was Re: 2116 and other old memory chips)

From: Ethan Dicks <ethan_dicks_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Sat Jul 7 08:34:33 2001

--- Richard Erlacher <edick_at_idcomm.com> wrote:
> It would have been difficult for them to do, since the CPU didn't have that
> capability. The Z80 had a hardware refresh cycle built into its operating
> circuitry. It had a refresh counter (though only 7 bits) which was placed on
> the address bus while the CPU decoded an opcode.

I realize that. I think what I was being told about was a refresh system
that depended on some line out of the CPU to tell when it was safe to do
a refresh cycle. The CPU locks up temporarily and blocks the refresh
accidentally until it recovers.

> >
> > The microcode faults I was told about for the XC68000 (not MC68000) would
> >
> The XC68000 was the designator for the earliest units, primarily engineering
> samples of the various masks...

Yes. My boss still has ours. It has a serial number (#424) engraved on
the lid. We were told that the first 400 were for internal Motorola use.

-ethan



=====
Visit "The Seventh Continent"
http://penguincentral.com/penguincentral.html

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Received on Sat Jul 07 2001 - 08:34:33 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:33:50 BST