Interest in UUCP?

From: Jim Strickland <>
Date: Wed Jun 20 16:59:52 2001

It's my impression the FCC takes a pretty dim view of spark-gap
transmitters. But then I've never been a ham or anything like that.
I don't *do* analog (yet).

> No packet hardware... I guess that my old Utica transciever would be
> useless for this. Since we're talking about sending/receiving data in
> a classic manner, wouldn't it be neat to use sparc-gap transmitters,
> and then never worrying about having to do any form of D/A or A/D
> conversion?

Jim Strickland
                              BeOS Powered!
Received on Wed Jun 20 2001 - 16:59:52 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:33:59 BST