Interest in UUCP?

From: Jim Strickland <jim_at_calico.litterbox.com>
Date: Wed Jun 20 16:59:52 2001

It's my impression the FCC takes a pretty dim view of spark-gap
transmitters. But then I've never been a ham or anything like that.
I don't *do* analog (yet).

> No packet hardware... I guess that my old Utica transciever would be
> useless for this. Since we're talking about sending/receiving data in
> a classic manner, wouldn't it be neat to use sparc-gap transmitters,
> and then never worrying about having to do any form of D/A or A/D
> conversion?

-- 
Jim Strickland
jim_at_DIESPAMMERSCUMcalico.litterbox.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
                              BeOS Powered!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Wed Jun 20 2001 - 16:59:52 BST