MS-DOS version (was: What's best to do?? classically speaking

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Fred Cisin <cisin_at_xenosoft.com>
Date: Sat Jun 23 13:37:47 2001

> Jim Strickland skrev:
> >Ah yes, DOS 5.0. The last time I felt I got my money's worth from
On 23 Jun 2001, Iggy Drougge wrote:
> Why? It had no GUI, no multitasking and rudimentary limitations on filenames.

So?, what's the down side?
Received on Sat Jun 23 2001 - 13:37:47 BST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Frank McConnell: "preserving / ressurecting old docs?"
Previous message: Dan Linder: "DECrepeater 90C"
In reply to: Iggy Drougge: "MS-DOS version (was: What's best to do?? classically speaking"
Next in thread: Iggy Drougge: "MS-DOS version (was: What's best to do?? classically speaking"
Reply: Iggy Drougge: "MS-DOS version (was: What's best to do?? classically speaking"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:34:00 BST