MS-DOS version (was: What's best to do?? classically speaking

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Iggy Drougge <optimus_at_canit.se>
Date: Sat Jun 23 19:30:12 2001

XenoSoft skrev:

>> Jim Strickland skrev:
>> >Ah yes, DOS 5.0. The last time I felt I got my money's worth from
>On 23 Jun 2001, Iggy Drougge wrote:
>> Why? It had no GUI, no multitasking and rudimentary limitations on
>> filenames.

>So?, what's the down side?

Are you into whips, chains and latex clothing as well?

--
En ligne avec Thor 2.6a.

Received on Sat Jun 23 2001 - 19:30:12 BST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Eric Chomko: "SWTPc S/09 is alive"
Previous message: Iggy Drougge: "Wave of the Future (Spam)"
In reply to: Fred Cisin: "MS-DOS version (was: What's best to do?? classically speaking"
Next in thread: Fred Cisin: "MS-DOS version (was: What's best to do?? classically speaking"
Reply: Fred Cisin: "MS-DOS version (was: What's best to do?? classically speaking"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:34:00 BST