IBM ROM BASIC or lack thereof

From: Fred Cisin <cisin_at_xenosoft.com>
Date: Mon Oct 1 17:15:46 2001

On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Russ Blakeman wrote:
> cost more, hence they left that out and included an on-disk BASIC
> interpreter, known as GW-BASIC. I'm not even sure if MS was responsible for
> the GW version either.

Yes. MICROS~1 provided GWBASIC to all of the clone NMS-DOS licensees. It
is ALMOST identical to BASICA.

--
Grumpy Ol' Fred        cisin_at_xenosoft.com
<A HREF= "http://www.xenosoft.com/dogears" >DogEars</A>
Received on Mon Oct 01 2001 - 17:15:46 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:34:17 BST