Mike Ford skrev:
>I've been looking for some 2.88 non-IBM PS/2 floppy drives, and I found
>some, but the guy says they are SCSI. Is that nuts or what?
>TEAC FD-235 J 5670-U W/SCSI Card
>TEAC FD-235 J 5670-U W/SCSI Card
>TEAC FD-235 J 610 W/SCSI Card
>Some of the HP/Apollo 725/50 computers I found recently had SCSI floppies,
>but it looked like the SCSI part might be detachable. I wonder if I should
>bother getting the above drives to work in a PC, which I would have to fuss
>around adding SCSI to?
It's quite possible to adapt PS/2 floppies to the common PC interface. A
friend of mine converted them for Amiga use, and the difference between the
Amiga and PC interfaces are negligible.
Since PS/2 floppies are a lot more common than SCSI ones, I'd say you'd
better slaughter some PS/2s.
--
En ligne avec Thor 2.6a.
"Auf Sparc-Maschinen ist Linux weit weniger gut. Auf Maschinen mit sun4
Architektur ist NetBSD etwa 30% schneller. Wer auf so einer Maschine
Linux faehrt tut es aus ideologischen Gruenden oder kennt nichts anderes."
Aus: de.comp.os.unix.misc, "Was ist schneller?"
Received on Wed Oct 10 2001 - 09:47:13 BST