gwynp skrev:
>On 11-Oct-2001 Iggy Drougge wrote:
>> It seems that WYSEs are notorious for being frail.
>My wyse 85 seems to be robust. I hope it doesn't die, because I *heart*
>the thing!
My WY60 works fine, too, but it seems that we've been lucky, compared to what
you might find in the big chunk of WYSE messages at
http://www.cs.utk.edu/~shuford/terminal_index.html.
>> There is WYSE emulation software available, but at a cost.
>Linux has a wyse60 termcap entry, but that's not really what you want.
So has NetBSD. It doesn't bother about such things as charset mappings.
--
En ligne avec Thor 2.6a.
We have support for the PMAGC-B's on pmax right? That is a PixelVision based
card right? I see Bt 463, that chip looks bigger than the 21164! Just looking
at it makes me want to write an Xserver!
Chris Tribo, NetBSD/pmax
Received on Thu Oct 11 2001 - 10:04:22 BST