Thats how my old address was destroyed. Likely this one too in time.
Does little good to have a valid address if the address has to be dumped
due to
being a spam trap.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Pete Turnbull <pete_at_dunnington.u-net.com>
To: classiccmp_at_classiccmp.org <classiccmp_at_classiccmp.org>
Date: Monday, October 22, 2001 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: List Maintenance
>On Oct 22, 12:39, Sellam Ismail wrote:
>
>> But for people using the archives for research it would be nice to be
>able
>> to e-mail the original poster (unless the address obscuring we're
talking
>> about will not completely remove the e-mail address from the message).
>
>I agree; it's been useful to me on a number of occasions, both when I've
>searched for something and when someone else has found me through the
list.
> I wouldn't want my address removed, just altered enough so automatic
>spambots won't get my address too often.
>
>OTOH, it's possible that my additional spam collection has come from
Usenet
>trawling rather than list archives, I suppose.
>
>--
>Pete Peter Turnbull
> Network Manager
> University of York
Received on Mon Oct 22 2001 - 20:44:19 BST