Abbr. (was Re: [OT] New toy...)

From: Clint Wolff <vaxman_at_qwest.net>
Date: Mon Oct 29 17:58:12 2001

On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Ian Koller wrote:

>
> speaking of ...
>
> > To those dismayed at the mangulations of language being
> > used by some people in email these days, this just goes
> > to show that there's nothing new under the sun. :-)
>
> can anyone fill in the blanks here ...
>
> IMHO - in my humble opinion
> IMO - in my opinion
> IIRC - if I recall correctly ?
yes
> OTOH - on the other hand
> FYI - for your information
> IOW -
> FWIW - for what it's worth
> AFAIK -
as far as I know
> WRT - with respect/regards to
> ISTR -
> TMK -
to my knowledge
> ISTR -
> SAS -
> FAE -
> FA -
> DIY - Do it yourself
> YMMV -
your mileage may vary
> HMMV -
> ECO - Engineering Change Order ?
> AAMAF -
> PITA -
pain in the ass
> IPA -
> TIA - Thanks In Advance
> NG -
no good
> NAOA - Not An Official Acronym
> TTBOMK - to the best of my knowledge
>
> I hate to admit it, but I haven't figured some of these out.
> And just maybe someone else hasn't either? but wouldn't want
> to be associated with asking any stupid questions?
>
> Feel free to add any that you feel to be significant.
>
>
>
>
>
> Greg Ewing wrote:
> >
> > John Lawson:
> >
> > > FB OM YR SIGS 599 RPT 599 QSL VIA BURO TNX ES 73 DE KB6SCO
> >
> > pete_at_dunnington.u-net.com (Pete Turnbull):
> >
> > > It's (mostly standard) radio ham CW (continuous wave) abbreviations, used
> > > to save keying too much morse.
> >
> > To those dismayed at the mangulations of language being
> > used by some people in email these days, this just goes
> > to show that there's nothing new under the sun. :-)
> >
> > Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
> > University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a |
> > Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. |
> > greg_at_cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
>
>
Received on Mon Oct 29 2001 - 17:58:12 GMT