[Fwd: Undeliverable Mail]
Ron;
Do you have any idea why your replies were rejected by the mail server? I'd
be happy to look into this for you. Did you get any error message back with
headers intact or anything?
Just in case this is the problem - FYI to you and the list members - our
mailservers check every mail going through our systems for relaying (either
source or destination address must be considered local to our mailserver),
plus our mailserver will not talk to any mail servers that are known "open
relays" as per ordb and mail-abuse. If your mail server is on ordb or
mail-abuse, you need to turn off 3rd party relaying or scream at your ISP to
get them to turn it off. Mail services is a specialty of mine - there is
absolutely NO valid reason to allow 3rd party relaying on a mail server.
Ever.
Jay West
----- Original Message -----
From: <RHudson_at_esprit.com>
To: Ron Hudson <rhudson_at_cnonline.net>
Cc: <classiccmp_at_classiccmp.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Undeliverable Mail]
>
>
>
>
> Well several of my replys were rejected by classicomp email system
> so here they all are together... :^)
>
> Ethan Dicks wrote:
>
> > --- Ron Hudson <rhudson_at_cnonline.net> wrote:
> >
> >> I was going to write a simulator for Bell Labs "Cardiac" (cardboard
> >> slide the slides and move bits be the cpu your self) computer, but
> >> all I
> >> can find is the Instruction Set...
> >
> >
> > Do you _have_ a CARDIAC? Do you want one?
> >
> > -ethan
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
>
>
> I don't have one, but the instruction set was listed
> on the Internet once or twice, 0,input ... What I
> don't have is the "Wireing" that graphic on the "cpu" side
> that controlls operation, and there are part that change
> with the instructions. Yes I would like a cardiac, any
> donations? (will trade for C coded emulator :^)
> [ will code for toys?? ] )
>
>
>
> I went on to "design" the 8 bit machine described because
> cardiac won't handle character data, only 3 digit numbers.
>
> I also wanted to make use of the a whole 8 bits, and have
> each instruction use only 8 bits (well some of them do read
> the next byte via indirect of the PC) Also I think the flag
> testing at for each instruction is um clever, what do you
> think.
>
> will repost instruction set if desired.
>
> I really wanted some of you to look over the instruction
> set and theory to see if I was obvously missing somthing.
>
>
>
> Reply to Zane... Thanks for the pointer to the TOPS-10 emulator
> I will see what I can do with it...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Fri Sep 07 2001 - 22:09:30 BST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:34:24 BST